Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

improved KDB logic #1291

Closed
2 of 4 tasks
markus2330 opened this issue Jan 23, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed
2 of 4 tasks

improved KDB logic #1291

markus2330 opened this issue Jan 23, 2017 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement

Comments

@markus2330
Copy link
Contributor

markus2330 commented Jan 23, 2017 •
edited

  • kdbGet should never fail by default (to allow admins to fix anything) allow kdbSet even after failed kdbGet #2955
  • on request programs should be able to fail kdbGet, maybe using proposal: kdbEnsure #868
  • should check if system/elektra is updated and remount everything if needed
  • get everything (mmap) so that all relevant keys are available for links
markus2330 pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 27, 2017
doc: update decision
56955f1 
see #1291
@markus2330 markus2330 mentioned this issue Jan 30, 2017
Merged
6 tasks
@markus2330 markus2330 mentioned this issue Feb 9, 2017
Merged
6 tasks
@markus2330 markus2330 mentioned this issue May 23, 2017
Closed
@markus2330 markus2330 mentioned this issue Jun 17, 2017
Closed
@markus2330 markus2330 mentioned this issue Jan 20, 2019
Closed
@markus2330 markus2330 self-assigned this Jan 26, 2019
@markus2330 markus2330 removed their assignment Feb 17, 2019
@markus2330 markus2330 mentioned this issue May 29, 2019
Closed
@markus2330 markus2330 added this to the 0.9.0 milestone Jun 9, 2019
@markus2330 markus2330 mentioned this issue Jun 9, 2019
Closed
@markus2330 markus2330 modified the milestones: 0.9.*, 1.0.0 Sep 22, 2019
@markus2330 markus2330 changed the title improved kdbGet logic improved KDB logic Sep 22, 2019
@markus2330 markus2330 removed this from the 1.0.0 milestone Nov 14, 2019
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Nov 13, 2020

I mark this issue stale as it did not have any activity for one year. I'll close it in two weeks if no further activity occurs. If you want it to be alive again, ping the issue by writing a message here or create a new issue with the remainder of this issue.
Thank you for your contributions 💖

@stale stale bot added the stale label Nov 13, 2020
@markus2330 markus2330 removed the stale label Nov 13, 2020
@rkamisetti792 rkamisetti792 mentioned this issue Oct 6, 2022
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@markus2330